Relay and Isolated Input Base BoardThis PCB is part one of a stackable series, which will comprise an Automation Controller, controllable via the ESP32-s or ESP-12E SOC modules. `This project is considered the next step in my quest to create the ultimate Home Automation controller.With this PCB, I attempt to solve a few problems, as well as incorporate some of my already well functioning circuits into a stackable base-board. In my previous project, (Make your own ESP12-E based IoT Controller) I managed to create ( in my opinion at least ) a close-to-very-easy-to-use device. While this may be true, the ESP-12E based controller still had quite a few shortcomings.-It can only be powered from a DC power source, making it necessary to have external AC-to-DC conversion components.-It has only two built-in relays-It has no optically Isolated inputs, thus making it necessary to use external circuitry to protect the inputs from voltages bigger than 3v.-It has only another 4 spare GPIO on the PCF8574 port expander-Needs more power ports ( 3v, 5v and GND ), as well as more access to the I2C Bus.-An external level converter is required to connect devices requiring 5v to the I2C Bus or other GPIO pins.Of all these, certainly the most painful, to me at least, is definitely the lack of support for powering the device directly from AC mains power.This project is thus my attempt to correct that. Another big concern is board size. I want to stay in a form factor that is relatively as small as possible, to make it easy to install into already available commercial electrical containers and boxes.It was thus decided to go for a series of stackable cards, with each adding functionality to the completed device, while not necessarily needing every single one of them in order to have a functional device.So, let us start with a detailed explanation of the PCB.Powering the device from AC power.This part seemed to me to be the most problematic at first, as designing a custom SMPS is definitely not something that I am very comfortable with. I have thus decided to use a commercially available PCB mounted AC/DC module, delivering 5v at 2A to take care of that issue. The HLK-10M05 is quite reliable and already proven in the industry. It is also relatively cheap and easily obtainable.Having the possibility to power the device completely from DC power is also not an ability that I would like to lose. I have thus also included a DC power jack as an alternative power source. This will power a 5v LDO regulator, as well as the required 3.3v LDO regulator for the ESP SOC. This 5v regulator is protected with a protection diode to prevent 5v power from flowing into it when the SMPS is in use.I have also noted in the ESP-12E version, that the regulators got a little hotter than I would like when powering the device from 15v DC.I have thus added some large via-stitched copper heatsinks below the LDO regulators, as well as the SMPS module to help to dissipate someof the generated heat. In the newest prototype, this seemed to work quite well.Quite a few filtering and decoupling capacitors were added to the power supply circuit to decrease any ripple to an absolute minimum.The +3v, +5v and ground lines are fed to the stacked boards through a 2x4 way header in the right-hand corner of the PCBThe usual anti-tracking cut-out slots were also added to all areas where mains power will be present. These areas were also excluded from the ground planes on the PCB.Optically Isolated Digital Inputs (x4)In the top left-hand corner of the PCB is an 8-way screw terminal, connected to the Optically Isolation Circuits. These signals will be sent up to the controller board via a 2x2 pin header in the same left-hand corner. The circuitry is based on a previous design of myself, based on the EL357N, and capable of accepting a signal of 5.5v to 32.0v DC. Please note that this signal is completely galvanically isolated from the board. This means that you must provide a separate ground for each individual input as well. This ground should not be common to the PCB, as doing that will defeat the purpose of isolating the input in the first place. Four status LEDs are provided for port status and debugging purposes.The Relay control circuitryThe relay control circuit is once again exactly the same, optically isolated relay driver circuit as was used in the ESP-12E IoT controller PCB. This circuit performs well and I did not see any need to change it. The only change was the addition of an additional two relays to the PCB.I think it is worth noting that these relays are MAINS POWER FREE, i.e DRY Contacts. This, in my opinion, provides greater flexibility to the end-user, by allowing him/her to switch AC or DC with a specific relay. The components for each relay driver is placed close together, in order to make repair and debugging in the event of a failure easier. The relay circuits are ACTIVE LOW, and the control signals are received from a 2x2 pin header roughly in the centre, right-hand side of the PCB.Standalone Use, or using the PCB with another microcontroller.It is also possible to use this PCB with another microcontroller, for example, an STM32 of Arduino, providing that you take in mind that the optically Isolated Inputs will provide a 3v signal. A level converter can be used to take them up to 5v. The relay drivers are also designed for 3v and need to be driven low to energise the relay. A total of 4 ground pins and two each 3v and 5v are broken out onto headers.Mechanical detailsThe PCB dimensions are +/- 100mm wide by 97mm high.6 mounting holes of 3.2mm diameter are provided for mountingAll AC capable connectors should be 5.08mm pitch screw-type terminals.Optically Isolated Inputs are 2.54mm screw-type terminals.All other headers are standard 2.54mm male pin headers.The device should be fused at 1A, with a slow-blow type fuse. ( Operating current is 700mA at peak )CodeThis PCB required no coding and contains no programmable parts.

10 Channel Level Shifter with Pi HeaderThis is a very quick and easy solution to an ever-present problem in my electronics life: Some Microprocessors and Sensors/Devices work on different voltages, and their IO pins are not X volt tolerant... Of all of these, the dear Raspberry Pi, as well as the RP2040 and ESP32/ESP8266 is most guilty. On the sensor side, Ultrasonic sensors, infrared thermometers etc, all want either 5v logic, or 3v logic... What follows then is usually an ugly resister/divider circuit on a breadboard, unstable connectors, unreliable data etc. This usually ends up costing a lot of time in debugging and getting it to work reliably. If you wanted to use this for something like SPI or I2C, it won't work either ... You could buy a readymade PCB module from somewhere online., they work, and are quite cheap, but Where is the fun in doing that?I decided to design my own, but with a bit of a twist added... I want it to be able to plug into the Raspberry Pi GPIO Port. I also wanted a lot of GPIO Channels, which had to be bidirectional. No sense in going only one -way!I came up with this:A BSS138 N-Channel Mosfet, with two 10k resistors, per channel. The circuit is not new, and it is not unique either. But it works beautifully. Do I need to say more? Assembly is easy, as all components are 0805 or bigger. Components are cheap as well. It finally makes working with the Raspberry Pi a pleasure, as I do not have to rely on breadboards and other funny stuff, and my expensive sensors will be safe, at least if I don't connect them wrong :) How to Use:Using this board is very easy. On the left-hand side, there are two headers, marked H1 and H2. These are the power inputs, HV for the high voltage ( for example 5v ) and LV for the low voltage ( 3v in our example ). Not that you have to connect BOTH grounds, as the device requires a common ground.Now, on the very right-hand side, is header H3. It is labelled as :LV1 - HV1down all the way to LV10 - HV10You can now easily connect the signals that you need to be converted.As an example for the Raspberry Pi, you will connect the signal wire(s) from the Pi to the LV Channel, and your 5v sensor or device to the HV Channel. You only need to make sure that the channel numbers match!Bi-Directional signals like I2C and SPI also works very well.

Design and Build an ESP8266 Based IoT Controller – Part 1by makeriot2020August 16, 2021Update: 08/09/2021I am pleased to announce that I have obtained permission from Nabu Casa and ESP Home, to use the "Made for ESPHome" Logo on this device. My thanks to Jesse and everyone else involved. ESPHome recently launched a "Made for ESPHome" project. You can find out more about that here-> https://esphome.io/guides/made_for_esphome.html Please note that the Gerber files ( currently rev 1.7) has been updated to reflect this change.OSHWA certification is now completed, with ID TH0008 being allocated to this project.Table of contentsIntroductionMy RequirementsMy SolutionExpandabilityPrototyping–> Initial Software Installation—–> Start Home Assistant—–> Install ESPHome—–> Flashing ESPHome–> Designing the Hardware—–> The Relay Driver Circuit(s)——–> Relay Driver Schematic——–> Status LED and User Input Schematic——–> The USB to Serial Schematic——–> The ESP-12E schematic with strapping pins, as well as the power supply circuit(s)—–> Designing the PCB——–> PCB Layout (Raw layers and Silkscreen, not Rendered)——–> Top Layer——–> Bottom Layer——–> 3D Render ( Top Layer from left )IntroductionThe Internet of Things (IoT), as well as Home Automation, are steadily gaining popularity all the time. You can already buy quite a lot of commercial products or do your own D.I.Y implementation. Many different companies offer various devices and modules to help you do your project easily. But many of us will know that these modules always come with a lot of wires and connections, which can be very unreliable, and also unsightly to look at.Most of these solutions are also relying on you placing some stuff on an electronics-breadboard, or strip-board for more permanent installations. You can also decide to design and manufacture your own custom PCB.On the software side of this problem, there are many commercial and open-source solutions available, and most of them work with almost anything on the market (With various degrees of complexity and a varying learning curve).My Requirement(s)Having access to a few ( four to be exact ) Raspberry Pi Computers, as well as a huge number of ESP8266, ESP32, Arduino and STM32 Development boards that are lying around in my working area, as well as being quite lazy to do repetitive tasks, I have been playing with the idea for quite a while to automate some or maybe all of the lights in my house. I have also built quite a few device prototypes, only to tear them down again after testing them.The reason for this, and this is only my own opinion, is that an electronics breadboard is meant for prototyping only.They are not reliable in the long term, and they look extremely messy. Using a certain development board, and connecting all of the supporting components and modules to it, also leaves quite a mess. So,1) The project must be contained on a single PCB.2) It must have WiFi and or Bluetooth support (ESP8266 does not have this [ Bluetooth ])3) It must be able to be powered from 220v mains directly, OR, through a single Plug Type AC to DC converter, preferably something already available on the market.4) The power supply unit must supply adequate power to the unit.5) I want to make some actual use of a Raspberry Pi, as they were not meant to lie around gathering dust6) Once completed, the project should be able to be updated OTA or with as little fuss as possible.7) The freedom to code in whatever language I want, as well as be easy to use with prebuilt firmware like ESPHome and or Tasmota and the likes.My Solution (Hardware and Software)Taking into consideration cost, as well as flexibility, I decided on using the ESP8266 and in later versions ESP32.These have WiFi and Bluetooth already built-in but have a nasty breadboard form factor. The popular NodeMCU is a great starting point, but it has many small design flaws, most of which were fixed in later versions, but, as I live in SE Asia, and electronics are super cheap, you never know what you get.With this in mind, I have decided to design my own controller, based on the ESP-8266 12E Module. This will give me the flexibility I need while allowing me to add custom components and features as needed, which is not possible with a stock version.As far as Software is concerned, Home Assistant, running on a Raspberry Pi 4B with 4Gb Ram will be sufficient to control all of this. Firmware on the ESP12-E can be either ESPHome, Tasmota, or something that I write on my own, connecting to the internet and using MQTT for communication. (The options here are also almost too many to mention, but, IFTTT, Adafruit IO, and Blynx come to mind… Alexa and Google Assistant support are also possible, but definitely not required in my application at this moment.Addon Hardware and ExpandabilityAny permanent project grows on you, and over time, you will want to add features and functions. Keeping this in mind when you start designing saves a lot of headaches later. I will thus definitely make sure to provide access to the I2S, SPI and Serial Peripherals.Prototyping and Initial TestingSoftwareIt is quite impossible to design something without building a prototype, and doing some very rigorous testing.To do this, I have started with a copy of Home Assistant running in a VM on my HP ML350G Debian server computer. This way, I can quickly test Home Assistant, and make sure everything works as I want it to, without having to do it on the PI. This will mean that I will have to re-do most of the software configuration again on the PI,but it gives me the flexibility to take snapshots and restore them if something goes wrong.Start Home AssistantWhen you have completed the installation, you can go ahead and start Home Assistant.You may now open Home Assistant in your browser by going to http://<your-ip-address>:8123 and pressing enter.You will see something similar to this:Install ESPHomeYou may now scroll down to the Supervisor Menu Item, Click on the Addon Store link, and Install ESPHome.Please make sure that you select “start on boot”, “watchdog”, “auto-update” and “show in the sidebar”Also, make sure to start the add-onFlashing ESPHome to your deviceYou are now ready to flash ESPHome onto your development board. Please note that you will have to repeat this step on the actual PCB device that we will design and build later.For now, we will however use a standard NodeMCU v3 module, as it contains the ESP-12E module that we require.As we have not configured HTTPS in our Home Assistant installation, we can only flash the initial firmware using an external application. This application is called ESPHome Flasher, and you can download it here.Prepare to FlashWe need to create an initial device in ESPHome. to do this, you need to click on the ESPHome Menu Item in the Home Assistant sidebar. Then click on the Green and White + sign at the bottom right corner…Give your device a descriptive name, I went with iot-con-prototype. Also, add your WiFi network credentials (SSID and Password). Then click on NEXT.You now have to select your ESP board. I went with NodeMCU.Click on NEXT when you are done.You will now be alerted that a configuration has been created. Click on the Close button.You will now see your device in the list. The red line means that the device is OFFLINE.If you have not installed ESPHome Flasher yet, now is a good time to do it. When you are done, connect the NodeMCU module to the computer’s USB port and start ESPHome Flasher.Note: On Linux, you dont have to install it. you can just start it from the terminal using./ESPHome-Flasher-1.3.0-Ubuntu-x64.exec ( this example is for Debian ) yours may differ … sudo may be requiredSelect the communications port from the dropdown menu.Now go back to Home Assistant, ESPHome Screen.Click on the Install link (in yellow) of the device that we added previously.Then click on Manual DownloadESPHome will now compile your initial firmware and prompt you to save the .bin file it has generated.Take note of the location of this file, we will need it for the next step.Now you can go back to the ESPHome Flasher window, and browse to the .bin file that you have just generated and downloaded.When this is done, you can click on Flash ESP. The firmware will now be flashed onto the NodeMCU device that we will use as our prototype.You can close the Flasher application when you see predominantly purple text in the console window. This means that the device has connected successfully with your WiFi network, and by extension, also with ESPHome and Home Assistant.If you now go back to ESPHome, you will see that the device has a green line above its name, which means that it is online. Please note that at this stage, the device does not do anything, as we have not yet configured it. That will be our next task, but before we do that, we will have to start playing with some of the physical hardware yet.Designing the HardwareI have decided to base this controller on the popular NodeMCU v3 development board. This little board makes use of the ESP12-E module, designed by AITinker, from whom I have bought many well-designed modules before. The module (NodeMCU) is in a BreadBoard form factor, and thus clearly meant for prototyping, or use on a base-board of some kind. I do however have some issues with this module, namely:1. Many of these units are in fact clones. Some of these does not have proper protection between the board and the USB port to power them. This makes it dangerous to connect power to the VIN pin.2. The board does not have a built-in 5v regulator. The 5v output (VIN) is thus taken directly from the USB port that powers it. This limits the total available current to the board and all peripherals to the 500mA available from the USB port.All of these issues are however easy to overcome, as Espressif has made available excellent documentation on using their modules. I will thus be using this documentation as a reference design for my own device.Another issue is expandability. The module provides many broken out GPIO pins (D0 to D8), but in order to remain super flexible for future expansion, I would have to make sure that I keep the built-in peripherals, like i2c, spi, and uart free for connection to external addon components in future. To solve this, I have decided on using the PCF8574 I2C IO Expander. This means that…D0 (GPIO16) needs to be kept free for Wake up from deep sleep modeD1 (GPIO5) SCL line of I2C BusD2 (GPIO4) SDA line of I2C BusD3 (GPIO0) connected to Flash Button, and also a strapping pinD4 (GPIO2) Tx of UART 1D5 (GPIO14) HSCLK – SPI ClockD6 (GPIO12) HMISO – SPI MISOD7 (GPIO13) Rx UART 2 / HMOSI – SPI MOSID8 (GPIO15) Tx UART 2 / HCS – SPI CS as well as a strapping pinD9 ([Rx] GPIO03) Rx UART 0D10 ([Tx] GPIO01) Tx UART 0Looking at this, it is thus very clear that I2C is the way to go, as it will use only two pins, leaving the other GPIO’s free for future expansion.Go back to the Table of ContentsRelay Driver Circuit, status led(s) and user controlThe PCF8574 has very weak current sourcing capabilities, but it can sink 25mA per IO pin. As I will be driving the chip from 3v, this will however not be enough to drive a 5v relay. I will thus be making use of an optocoupler to drive the relay from 5v, using a general-purpose NPN transistor. That way, I can make sure that I do not overload the IO line on the PCF8574, as well as keep the 3v and 5v lines isolated from each other. (They will however still share a common ground).Relay Driver SchematicAs you can see from the schematic above, the relay driver(s) will be connected to P0 and P1 of the PCF8574. A 200-ohm resistor will limit the current to about 16.5mA @ 3.3v. This is well within the tolerance of 25mA for the PCF8574 as well as the 50mA limit of the EL357N Optocoupler chip.On the output side, I made use of the S8050 general purpose NPN transistor, capable of a 25v collector-emitter voltage, ant a continuous current of 500mA. Move than sufficient to drive the +/- 70mA to 80mA of current required by the relay coil. The current through the phototransistor side of the optocoupler is limited by a 1k resistor to the base of the transistor, to 5mA.PCF8574 IO Expander Status LED(s) and User Input SchematicGo back to the Table of ContentsProvision is made for up to four (4) pushbuttons, by pulling pins P4 to P7 down to ground, through an external push-button connected to a 2-way pin header. The design allows for the pin to be used for another function as well, with an additional breakout pin provided on the edge of the board.Likewise, the two status LED’s on P2 and P3 is connected via a 470-ohm resistor each, driving them at approximately 7mA each. This is once again within the 25mA sink limit of the PCF8574. These pins can also be used to connect to other hardware instead via the breakout header at the edge of the board.The user input(s) and status led circuit was purposefully kept as plain as possible, as it is very likely that the additional 6 ports taken up by these will be used for other purposes instead.USB to Serial InterfaceThe USB-to-Serial interface is done by using a CH340G. I have not modified the reference design from the original NodeMCU v3 too much, as it works well, and thus need no changes. I did however make sure that there is a protection diode between the USB 5v line and the VIN line on the PCB. Most of the existing NodeMCU boards does not do this, or when they do have the protection diode, that line is directly connected to the VIN pin. in my view, that is not ideal, and can cause unnecessary damage to your computer’s USB port or NodeMCU board in the event that you power it from an external source, and also use USB power to upload code… Not that it should be done that way anyway, but rather safe than sorry later.USB-to-Serial SchematicThe two transistors (VT1, and VT2) is used to do very cleverly put the board into programming mode, as well as reset it after flashing, without the end-user having to press any of the flash or reset buttons. This is also part of the reference design on some of the NodeMCU boards. I can not comment if it is standard. I found it useful, so decided to include it as well.ESP-12E with strapping pins and power supplyThe ESP-12E module, as manufactured by AITinker, seems to be quite stable and easy to use. It does however have a couple of caveats, to enable it to function as intended. The strapping pins (discussed later) should be in a certain state at bootup time, and failure to adhere to that will definitely cause a failed boot or wrong startup mode.GPIO0, GPIO2, EN and RST should be pulled HIGH for a NORMAL boot, while GPIO15 should be pulled LOW.Pulling GPIO0 LOW at boot, will put the board into FLASH mode.Another change that I made is that I did not break out the raw Analog input pin, as is done on some of the boards ( as a VV pin, or sometimes as an unlabeled, or reserved pin). The Analog input pin on the stock module is designed for around 1.0v input. This is fed from a resistor divider, to effectively scale your 5v input down to valid levels.ESP-12E and Power Supply SchematicGPIO16 (D0) is used internally by the ESP-12E to wake the module from deep sleep. This is done by connecting GPIO16 to the reset pin. To wake up the module, GPIO16 is internally pulled LOW, thereby resetting the module.I have decided to add a user-selectable jumper that can be enabled to connect GPIO16 to RESET, that enabling this functionality. It is however to be noted that the jumper must ONLY be set AFTER the relevant deep sleep mode has been enabled in the firmware for the module.The standard NodeMCU has only a single 3.3v voltage regulator installed. I added a dedicated 5v voltage regulator as well and powered it directly from the VIN pin. This regulator will only function when the device is powered from an external power source, with an upper voltage limit of 15v DC. Protection for the USB port is provided by a diode between VCC_USB and VCC5V.Designing the PCBAs I have mentioned at the start of the article, this is a show and tell, of how I solved a particular problem that I had.I do not believe in re-inventing the wheel, but to adapt and improve as and where I see fit, to my own purpose. This project will by no means be unique, or better or worse than other similar devices on the market today. It is however designed to suit my particular needs for my particular project.The design of the PCB and Schematics was done in EasyEDA, which I believe to be quick and easy to use, as well as Linux friendly. (There does not seem to be many of those around, KiCAD being the exception to that rule. I have however not been too successful in using that before, to no fault of KiCAD at all. I am just not prepared to learn a new EDA CAD package just for the sake of doing it. Time is precious, and I can get everything I need to do done with EasyEDA).PCB LayoutThe PCB is dual-layer 99.06mm x 83.058mm. Six mounting holes are provided. The ESP-12E is placed at the top,roughly in the left-hand corner. As per Espressif design recommendations, no tracks are routed underneath the antenna area. An approximate 15mm x Board width area is also kept clear of any tracks or ground plane(s) to also prevent interference with the RF signal generated by the device. All components are mounted on the top payer of the PCB and are as far as possible grouped together by their function and purpose in the circuit. As the two onboard relay modules will very likely be used to switch mains power, they have also been excluded from the ground plane(s). Cutouts around all possible mains power carrying pads and tracks were also added to prevent tracking.A DC Power Socket, and USB port, as well as access to the single Analog Input, Enable, Reset Pin and Button and VIN pin is provided on the left-hand side of the PCB. All other IO pins, as well as the six remaining ports on the PCF8574 IO expander, is accessible on the right. Note that GPIO4 and GPIO5 ( D1 and D2 ) were hard-wired as I2C lines. They should thus not be used for any other purpose. All other pins are accessible and broken out, clearly labelled with their GPIO numbers, as well as NodeMCU style Dx numbers. There are also an additional 6 IO pins broken out at the bottom of the ESP-12E module, to provide access to the seldom-used SDCard interface.PCB Top Layer ( Rendered )PCB Bottom Layer (Rendered)3D Render PCB from LeftOur next step will be to write the YAML configuration file...YAML configurationOur next step will be to write the YAML configuration file...YAML configurationESPHome uses the YAML language to define IO and automation. These files are then parsed, converted into C/C++ and compiled. The resulting Binary File is the uploaded OTA to the device via WiFi.We will still be using our Virtual Machine Image of Home Assistant, running inside VirtualBox on our PC.Go ahead and start that, and then open Home Assistant in your Web Browser. Then click on ESPHome.You will see a screen similar to the one above.While we are at this point, I believe it is a good time to clarify why we do the development in a virtual PC, and not directly on our Home Assistant instance running on a Raspberry Pi. The reason is actually very simple. Home Assistant seems to have issues with completely removing unused entities. This is not a problem, but you could potentially end up with a lot of stale entries in your production Home Assistant Server. The VM solution allows us to test everything away from the actual server, and then, when we are done, recreate the working device on the actual server. That way, there is almost no chance of damaging your existing Home Assistant Server, which you may already have spent some time on to set up just the way you want it...Continue by clicking on the EDIT link, in the iot-con-prototype device that we created in the last tutorial.You will see a file similar to this ...esphome:name: iot-con-prototypeplatform: ESP8266board: nodemcuv2# Enable logginglogger:# Enable Home Assistant APIapi:ota:password: "3f132fc270315361e4d2393a50c2bac5"wifi:ssid: "<your ssid here>"password: "<your password here>"# Enable fallback hotspot (captive portal) in case wifi connection failsap:ssid: "Iot-Con-Prototype"password: "4uSytyPTx1TO"captive_portal:This is the default configuration file generated by ESPHome. We will build on this file... Note that your OTA Password will be different. DO NOT CHANGE OR MODIFY IT IN ANY WAY!When we edit YAML, indentations are extremely important, so try to follow exactly what I am doing.Our IoT Controller uses I2C to communicate with the PCF8574 chip. Let us assume that you have set your address to 0x22h by using the dip switch on the PCB, you could of course set any other address, just make sure that you know what it is.We now need to tell ESPHome that we have an I2C Bus and that it needs to scan this bus for devices. That way, we can see in the logs if it actually detects our device or not.Add the following 5 lines to your file:i2c:sda: GPIO4scl: GPIO5scan: trueid: i2c_bus_aThey mean that we will have an I2C bus with SDA on GPIO4, and SCL on GPIO5.The bus will have an ID of i2c_bus_a and the bus should be scannedThe next section will be the actual PCF8574 Io ExpanderAdd the following lines to the file:pcf8574:- id: 'pcf8574_hub'address: 0x22pcf8575: falseWe give this device the id of pcf8574_hub and specify its address as 0x22. We also NEED to specify that it is NOT the 16 port pcf8575 variant.Now we can start configuring our outputs. for our purposes, we will have two relay outputs, as well as two status LEDs. In the actual circuit, the pcf8574 will sink the pins connected to these, as the chip can sink more current than it can safely source. Refer to the relay driver schematic for more information on that.Go ahead, and add the following to your file.output:- platform: gpioid: relay_1pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 0mode: OUTPUTinverted: true- platform: gpioid: relay_2pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 1mode: OUTPUTinverted: true- platform: gpioid: led_status_1pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 2mode: OUTPUTinverted: true- platform: gpioid: led_status_2pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 3mode: OUTPUTinverted: trueThe syntax should be straightforward, every output will have a platform, in this case, gpio.Then we will need a unique ID, let us say relay_1Now, we need to specify the physical pin to use. Now here, you could also specify a native pin on the actual NodeMCU device that we are using for testing, but we will specify a pin on the pcf8574 instead.This is done with the pin: directivepin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hub // This tells the parser to use the device at address 0x22 that we specified before.number: 0 // use GPIO 0mode: OUTPUT // this can be either INPUT or OUTPUT, for our case, it should be OUTPUT.inverted: true // Invert the logic of the pin.Once again, it is needed, as we are sinking current into the pin, and the circuit was designed that way...You can however use it noninverted if you really want, it will just look a bit odd on Home Assistant, if your On state, actually meant OffThe next section will be called binary inputs and may seem a bit confusing at first. But, trust me, it is not. This is just the way that we define our physical push buttons on the device. We need those, in the event that our Home Assistant Server is offline, or when we need to physically press a button on the device.What? Why? Are we not building an IoT Controller? Why should we press any physical buttons on it?Well, the answer to that is quite obvious. There will definitely be times that you want to control an attached device by pressing a physical button. It does not make sense to scurry around, swiping through apps on your smartphone, while you are standing right next to the device in question. To leave out this basic functionality, would be plain silly, and in my view, bad engineering.binary_sensor:- platform: gpioid: push_button_1name: 'Relay1 Pushbutton'device_class: ''pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 4mode: INPUTinverted: trueon_press:then:- switch.toggle: switch_relay1filters:- delayed_on_off: 50ms- platform: gpioid: push_button_2name: 'Relay2 Pushbutton'device_class: ''pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 5mode: INPUTinverted: trueon_press:then:- switch.toggle: switch_relay2filters:- delayed_on_off: 50msThe syntax is almost the same as the outputs above, but we are also adding automation:We want the relay to be toggled each time the button is pressed. This will allow us to use only one button per relay to switch it on or off.We are also adding a filter, in this case, a bit of debouncing, of 50ms. This will prevent the chattering of the contacts on the switch from generating more than one event for each button press.The final section of the file will be a switch: section. This will allow you to control the relays from inside Home Assistant. ( The outputs are considered an internal to ESPHome function, and will thus not be exposed to Home Assistant.Add the following lines to the fileswitch:- platform: outputid: switch_relay1name: "Relay No. 1 (#0)"output: relay_1on_turn_on:- output.turn_on: led_status_1on_turn_off:- output.turn_off: led_status_1- platform: outputid: switch_relay2name: "Relay No. 2 (#1)"output: relay_2on_turn_on:- output.turn_on: led_status_2on_turn_off:- output.turn_off: led_status_2You can see that the syntax is once again very easy to understand. We also specify that the status LED for the relevant relay channel be switched on or off with the relay. This also happens when you press the physical switch.The name element will be the Name of the Output that will be displayed in Home Assistant. You can change it to your liking here, or you can also change it inside Home Assistant itself.The completed file should now look like this. NOTE that if you decide to copy-paste the file from here, as I would recommend, you should only copy from the i2c section to the end of the file. Do not copy the WiFi and other sections. Your own file already has your own settings.esphome:name: iot-con-prototypeplatform: ESP8266board: nodemcuv2# Enable logginglogger:# Enable Home Assistant APIapi:ota:password: "3f132fc270315361e4d2393a50c2bac5"wifi:ssid: "<your ssid here>"password: "<your password here>"# Enable fallback hotspot (captive portal) in case wifi connection failsap:ssid: "Iot-Con-Prototype"password: "4uSytyPTx1TO"captive_portal:#DO NOT COPY ANYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE --------i2c:sda: GPIO4scl: GPIO5scan: trueid: i2c_bus_apcf8574:- id: 'pcf8574_hub'address: 0x22pcf8575: falseoutput:- platform: gpioid: relay_1pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 0mode: OUTPUTinverted: true- platform: gpioid: relay_2pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 1mode: OUTPUTinverted: true- platform: gpioid: led_status_1pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 2mode: OUTPUTinverted: true- platform: gpioid: led_status_2pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 3mode: OUTPUTinverted: truebinary_sensor:- platform: gpioid: push_button_1name: 'Relay1 Pushbutton'device_class: ''pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 4mode: INPUTinverted: trueon_press:then:- switch.toggle: switch_relay1filters:- delayed_on_off: 50ms- platform: gpioid: push_button_2name: 'Relay2 Pushbutton'device_class: ''pin:pcf8574: pcf8574_hubnumber: 5mode: INPUTinverted: trueon_press:#min_length: 50ms#max_length: 500msthen:- switch.toggle: switch_relay2filters:- delayed_on_off: 50msswitch:- platform: outputid: switch_relay1name: "Relay No. 1 (#0)"output: relay_1on_turn_on:- output.turn_on: led_status_1on_turn_off:- output.turn_off: led_status_1- platform: outputid: switch_relay2name: "Relay No. 2 (#1)"output: relay_2on_turn_on:- output.turn_on: led_status_2on_turn_off:- output.turn_off: led_status_2Well done, That was quite easy.Copy and paste the file into the edit screen that you have opened in ESPHome.If everything went well. you should see an option to save or install as in the picture below.YAML configuration file. ESPHomeIf you can see both Save and Install, it means that your file syntax is correct. If not, go back and carefully check your indentations, as well as the spelling of the commands. It should not be a problem if you copied it from above...Now click on save. You will get a confirmation.Make sure that the prototype is connected to the USB port of the computer, or to another power source. Wait a few seconds to make sure that it is connected to the network, and then click Install.ESPHome will now parse your YAML file, generate the needed code, and compile it. After that, it will upload the new firmware to your device. Wait until you can see the device restart and connect to the network in the log window.The Firmware is compiled and the uploaded OTAThe device had booted, note that the PCF8574 has been detected and that we can see our configuration data (in purple text)Configuring Home AssistantWe can now start to add this all to Home Assistant. It is also very likely that you will be prompted to add the device by Home Assistant itself. If this did not happen, or like with my testing image on the VM, you have a lot of old stuff floating around as well, we can do it manually ...Go to the Configuration Menu, and click on Integrations.Click on the esp8266-nodemcu option on ESPHomeClick on the entities, next to the device ...The available entities ( selected with a blue checkmark ). Entities with a red warning are stale, meaning old, unavailable or offline... You can remove them, but they tend to show up again on their own...We can now select the two relays, as well as the Pushbuttons. Then click on Enable selected.When you now go back to the Home Assistant Home screen, you will see your device with its controls, on the screen. You can now control the device from Home Assistant. You will note that the two push-buttons are also present in Home Assistant, but, they are only indicators. This means that while they will change state briefly when you press the physical switches, they can not be controlled directly from Home Assistant. They can however be used in automation, or at least I believe so. The debouncing times are however rather short, so I would recommend that you base any automation on the actual relay states instead.A sneak preview of the PCBSo let us look at these boards...PCB's in packagingSecurely packaged in vacuum-packed bubble wrapTopside of the PCBTop Side of PCBBack of PCB, isolation cutouts clearly visibleThe PCB's have arrived.My biggest frustration now will be to wait for the rest of the components to arrive. I already have some of them in stock, and can repurpose some others, but I think that I will rather wait for everything to arrive so that I don't have toassemble them in stages. I plan to assemble 2 of the 10 boards and make some of the remaining 8 available to interested people. Contact me on messenger if you are interested.Assembly and Initial TestingThe majority of the components have finally arrived, and I can at long last start with assembly. I have also discovered, to my irritation, that I have made 3 small errors on the PCB design ( all of which have been fixed in the Gerber Files, as well as on the schematics, as ver 1.5)These errors were however easily fixed in every case, to render the board completely useable and functional. Some disclosure seemed important :)Let us look at what was wrong, and how I fixed it.1) No Ground on C10, C11 and U2Somewhere during the design stage, I decided to add a dedicated 5v LDO regulator, as the PCB would be powered from various sources. These include the DC Input Jack on the left-hand side of the PCB. This will allow for up to 15v DC input, You can also power directly from any pin marked 5v, or directly from 3.3v ( in which case only the ESP12-E and related circuitry would function, the relay(s) won't work in this case).I fixed this by adding two wire links from the ground at C10 and C11 to the Ground at C1.Please note that the capacitor at C1 is a 10uf Tantalum. It is designed as a 100uf electrolytic, which has not yet arrived :( I was not prepared to recycle any 100uf electrolytic from somewhere else, as I don't consider them stable after being desoldered and reused. The 10uf Tantalum cap does however work well.2). Wrong labelling and tracks at PCF8574 I2C Port. This one was a little bit more difficult to find. On the ESP-12E, GPIO5 is usually used as SCL and GPIO4 as SDA. Being a bit overconfident, I forgot to verify with the PCF8574 Datasheet, and thus connected the nets in reverse, meaning GPIO5 went to SDA on the PCF8574, and GPIO4 went to SCL. This is not really a problem, as I2C is assigned in software, but it could lead to confusion. The labels on the Pin Header were also reversed.3.) The 5v output pin next to D3 was left unconnected to any net. This was fixed with a wire loop on the bottom of the board from another 5v pin.Making mistakes on a prototype is in my opinion not the end of the world, as long as you find them, document them, and of course, fix them asap. In this case, all errors were promptly fixed and updated to the design files.Testing the PCB.The PCB was next tested for correct operation, and all parts of the circuit passed, with exception of the USB to Serial circuit, as the 12Mhz crystal was incorrectly supplied at 8Mhz, and the CH340G would not function correctly with that crystal.This was however NOT a problem, as the board can easily be flashed with an external FTDI or similar USB-to-Serial adapter, while keeping in mind that you should press and hold down the flash button, then reset the board by pressing the reset button, and after a few seconds, letting go of the flash button. You should also manually reset the board after every upload procedure to start running your firmware.This would all have been happening automatically, but due to logistics issues, was not possible on the prototypes. The correct 12Mhz crystal will be retrofitted to the boards when it eventually arrives.Power consumption with the board in an idle state was 75mA and 255mA with all relays energised, and all status led's lit up. Well within the 800mA limit of the LDO voltage regulators used.Updating the ESPHome firmware.I proceeded to make more changes to the ESPHome yaml code used to control the board.I added a remote reset switch, as well as monitors for the WiFi signal and Vcc to the ESP-12E.I also connected a DHT11 Temperature and Humidity sensor, as well as an LM73 I2C temperature chip, to measure the temperature of the device enclosure.The LM73 is currently not directly supported by ESPHome, so I had to write a custom driver. ( File to be included in the attachments )This header file needs to be uploaded into the ESPHome config folder on the home Assistant Server and referenced as an include file in the yaml configuration.To make the device even more flexible, I configured a local mosquito MQTT server on a separate server and added that configuration to the yaml file as well. This, combined with some local automation rules running directly on the ESP-12E, will allow me to control the device with an app like MQTT Dash on my Android phone, without needing Home Assistant to be running.The picture above shows the initial integration into the Home Assistant Testing Server. Note that in this picture, the LM73 was not yet implemented.We can see the device in the EE Lab area, and the administrative details, like Vcc, WiFi signal and Reboot switch, in the Master Control Panel card.In the pictures below, I will show you the full integration, of two devices into Home Assistant.Please see attached code under attachments.The Project is released under the following Open Source Licences:To do:Provide pictures of MQTT in operation.List issues with Tasmota

All of us Makers like to tinker with stuff, and in this process, we may find ourselves thinking about how to connect device A to my Arduino… Device A may operate at a different voltage from the Arduino, and may thus damage it badly….Many different solutions exist to do this, but, many of them, like relays, can be quite bulky, increasing the overall size of your project, as well as putting bigger demands onto your power supply unit.Having worked in the Industrial Automation sector for a few years, I remember that we used to have dedicated hardware to protect our sensitive controllers from the harsh outside signals that we needed to monitor. These devices were called isolators, and today I will show you how to construct your own version of this essential device.But some theory is needed first…What does it mean to isolate a signal? In the electronics world, you might have seen that you usually have to use a common ground between all your devices to make them work together properly. While this is definitely true, let us look at another example…Let us say you have some device, that will send you a voltage signal when it switches on, and another voltage signal when it is switched off. This device runs on 24 volts, so some of the more informed of us will immediately say you need a level converter, meaning a device that changes the 24v signal into a 5v signal… Others will try to use a relay to convert the signal ( A relay is also a type of isolation device ). A much more elegant way of doing this will be by using an Optic Isolator chip.A simple Optic Isolator ChipThis chip provides complete isolation between your device and the Arduino or other microprocessor. It does that by using infrared light to transmit the signal. Light, as we all know, does not conduct electricityWhereas a relay will only give you an on or an off state, the Opto-coupler or Optic Isolator can also do linear current transfer, meaning that the more IR light it transmits, the more current the photo-transistor will allow to pass as well.In my circuit, I made use of the following circuit…As we can see in the two circuits above, there is no common ground between the input and output sides of the circuit. This is ideal, as noise and other undesirable signals will not be transferred from one circuit to the other. It also allows you to use a very high input voltage, at a frequency of up to 2kHz.I have also decided to combine this with the PCF8574 I2C Port Extender. That way, I can cascade up to 64 inputs on the I2C bus. In a later version, I will also do an Opto-Isolated Output module.The Shield is only slightly bigger than the standard Arduino Uno, and all Arduino pins are broken out on headers.It is important to remember that A4 and A5 should not be used for any other purpose (They provide access to the I2C bus). Likewise, the interrupt pin of the PCF8574 can be connected to either D2 or D3 with a jumper, or left disconnected by completely removing the jumper. Device addressing can be set with the 3-way DIP switch on the board.This shield was designed to allow an input of between 3.0v and 32.0v to be applied to the various inputs. This will be completely galvanic isolated from the rest of the circuitry on the shield and thus also from your Arduino, or other micro-controller if you choose to use another one Yes, This is possible, as long as you power the shield with 3.0v to 5.0v. You will also have to connect your I2C bus to the SCL and SDA Lines marked on the shield.Please note that, if you decide to do that, the other Arduino specific pins, as broken out on the shield headers, will have no connections to anything else. :), an obvious fact, but it should be stated, it seemsThe Circuit DiagramCircuit Diagram, Page 1 of 2As you can see on page 1, each optically isolated input has a voltage divider resistor network in front of the Opto Coupler. This resistor network also limits the current that can be used by the infrared LED inside of the EL357N chip to 5mA at 32v DC. ( The chip can accept up to 50mA, but it should not be driven so hard ) A diode provides reverse-polarity protection to each input as well.Another voltage divider on the output side limits the current to the PCF8574 Chip. This can also only source or sink 25mA per IO.Note that there is NO common ground between the input and output sides of this circuit. That means that you have to provide another ground, usually from your external device… This ensures that galvanic isolation between the two circuits is maintained.On page 2, we can see the various net connections to the connectors, PCF8574 chip, as well as various jumper headers, to select the interrupt pin [H3] ( For Arduino, D2 or D3, other micro-controllers: you are free to select any GPIO to connect to the D2 or D3 header pin ).You can also select to enable or disable the pull-up resistors on the I2C bus, by shorting the jumper on [H2].This is usually only needed on the first shield, or in other words, you need one pair of pullup resistors per i2c bus, not one pair per device!Device addressing is selected with SW1. 8 addresses are available but switching this switch as per the table on the back of the PCB. It is worth mentioning that depending on the version of the PCF8574 chip that is on the shield, there are 8 addresses available, with 0x20h to 0x27h being common on the PCF8574, and 0x38h to 0x3fh being used on the PCF8574A/T version.Typical ConnectionTypical connection of input. Note that there is no common ground between the two devicesThe PCBThe shield is built on a double-sided PCB or 71.12mm x 61.72mm. This is only slightly bigger than the standard Arduino Uno. All resistors, capacitors and LED’s are of 0805 sizes. ( smaller than that is a bit hard on my eyes, although it can be done, just takes longer ). A ground plane is provided on both sides of the PCB.PCB design fileAll Arduino pins are broken out on a double row of 2.54mm headers. This allows you to use either the outside row with stack-able male-female headers, like on most shields, or you can use dedicated male and female headers, in a zig-zag pattern to stack the shields.I have done the same with the ICSP header, as on many other commercially available shields, there is only a single female 3×2 header on the bottom, making it quite annoying to use on another shield.PCB TopsideThis project is released under the following licences...This project has also been registered with OSHWA